~

It was seventy-five years ago today that the United States dropped the
plutonium bomb on the city of
Nagasaki in
Japan; along with the atomic bombing of
Hiroshima three days prior, it ushered in the
Nuclear Age and the terror and fears that come with it. The mistakes and misunderstandings of the event were documented by
John Hersey (
links below).
The war had actually been over;
President Truman was aware of this but went ahead with the action to test how the new weapon would work (
links below)!
Official portrait
Hiroshima has muffled the voices of the
Nagasaki
hibakusha (“the bombed,” the term for atomic-bombing survivors), who
have struggled for more than seven decades to gain equal attention for
the trauma and aftermath of their bombing.
The
different approaches to atomic commemoration taken by officials in each
city has contributed to the rise of “Hiroshima” and impeded the memory
work of the
Nagasaki hibakusha to distinguish their experience as separate. Authorities in
Hiroshima quickly rebuilt the city as a site of atomic trauma and peace activism, while their counterparts in
Nagasaki downplayed the atomic bombing to instead promote the city as a site of historical cosmopolitanism.
Early reconstruction plans in
Nagasaki explicitly set out to make the bombing a secondary characteristic of the city’s identity, much to the consternation of the
hibakusha.
Municipal officials (many of whom had also survived the bombing) chose
instead to emphasize the city’s earlier historical legacy as a center of
international trade and culture.
長崎
In reference to the destructive birth of the nuclear age, the focus is usually on
Hiroshima. It was first, and firsts get precedence in memory. It was also more devastating an attack than
Nagasaki,
with nearly twice as many dead and injured and three times as much land
area destroyed. (This was in spite of the fact that the
Little Boy, dropped by the
Enola Gay, was only three-quarters as explosive as the
Fat Man.) But if
Hiroshima was, from a military perspective, relatively well considered, well planned, and well executed,
Nagasaki was almost the opposite. From the very beginning, it was a JANCFU (Joint Army Navy Combined Foul Up (polite form) or
SNAFU
of major proprtions—a sign that this new era was as likely to be a
comedy of errors and near-misses as the product of reason and strategy.
Nagasaki was not the original target,
Kyoto was (
links below).
Conventional wisdom holds that these two atomic explosions - the only use of nuclear bombs in the history of war - brought
World War II
to an end. Yet an increasing number of historians are critical of this
interpretation. International experts say it is a myth and say it
glorifies a war crime that killed more than 100 thousand civilians.
Historian
Tsuyoshi Hasegawa argues that the unexpected declaration of war by the
Soviet Union on
Japan is what really pushed
Tokyo to surrender. He says that
Japan had been hoping that
Moscow would step in to broker a diplomatic end to the conflict. Research in
Russian
archives has discovered that the United States knew that, so why did it
drop the bombs at all? Especially the second one? There is an excellent
documentary on YouTube produced by
Deutsche Welle (DW Documentary) as to whether it was even necessary; it is very difficult to watch (
link below).
In 1939, physicists
Albert Einstein and
Leo Szilard drafted a letter to US President
Franklin D. Roosevelt, urging him to research atomic bombs before the
Germans could build one first. By 1942, the United States had approved the top-secret
Manhattan Project to build a
nuclear reactor and assemble an
atomic bomb.
As he witnessed the first detonation of a nuclear weapon on July 16, 1945, a piece of
Hindu scripture ran through the mind of
Robert Oppenheimer: “Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds.”
The bomb used on the city of
Nagasaki was actually a plutonium implosion bomb, whose code name was "
Fat Man". The bomb used on
Hiroshima had the code name, "
Little Boy".
Tinian Island
Even
though the two bombs, which fell on Aug. 6 and 9, killed more than
200,000 people in the two cities and injured many others, the United
States enforced a ban, in both countries, on photographs (yes, difficult
to see but not for that reason) that showed the civilian impact (
links below). There are indications that the bombing was unnecessary (
link below).
Through much of
World War II,
Allied bombers would sometimes drop leaflets warning of the impending
bombing of a city. The leaflets often told civilians to evacuate, and
sometimes encouraged them to push their leaders to surrender. The first
round, known as the "
LeMay
leaflets," were distributed before the bombing of Hiroshima. The
historical record is unclear, but it seems as though these leaflets did
not make it to
Nagasaki until after it, too, had been hit by an atomic bomb (
link below).
Located in the northern part of
Nagasaki,
the Urakami District was the location where hidden Christians resided
during the 17th to 19th centuries during the ban on Christianity. Today,
it is also known as the location of the
Urakami Cathedral
where the atomic bomb exploded. According to one theory, approx. 15,000
Christians were living in this area and more than 10,000 of them were
killed (
link below).
movie poster
The Beginning or the End was directed by
Norman Taurog and starred
Brian Donlevy,
Robert Walker, and
Tom Drake, and released by
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer. The film dramatizes the creation of the atomic bomb in the
Manhattan Project and the
bombing of Hiroshima.
The film originated in October 1945 as a project of actress
Donna Reed and her high school science teacher, Edward R. Tompkins, who was a chemist at the
Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
MGM camera crew - July 1946
In 1954, when the monster
Godzilla, or “Gojira,” (a giant
dinosaur
depicted in the film as having been aggravated by a hydrogen bomb)
appeared before Japanese movie audiences, many left the theaters in
tears (
link below).
The heavily furrowed skin or scales of the monster were imagined to resemble the
keloid scars of survivors of the two atomic bombs that the U.S. dropped on
Japan nine years earlier.
At
this date the The US Government plans to spend over a trillion dollars
on nuclear weapons. This spending is not set in stone and depends on the
willingness of Congress to continue to provide funding for each project
in successive yearly allocation processes. Moreover, the 2017 report
discusses a political reality determined by eight years of the Obama
Administration, not Trump Administration priorities, such as possibly
restarting nuclear weapons testing and developing low-yield nuclear
arms. Ultimately, the decision about investment in nuclear modernization
is reached through a complex process involving work of executive branch
agencies like the
Department of Defense,
the President’s yearly budget request, and confirmation or denial by
Congress of any particular monetary request. This means that the $1.2
trillion figure captures a moment in time—one possibility of what the
true outcome may be. (
link below).
Viewfinder links:
Net links:
NY Times ~ These Photographers Worked Under Mushroom Clouds
Time ~ Why We Shouldn't Overlook Nagasaki
YouTube links:
Styrous® ~ Sunday, August 9, 2020